← A. Inventions, No. 54
Théodule Bonheur II (1676–1714)
Viola Della Cooperazione
1702
Théodule Barthélemy Bonheur II, Paris, France. Spruce, maple, ebony, boxwood, and gut strings. 19⅜ × 16½ × 6⅛". Collection of the author.
I couldn’t end the week on yesterday’s post about the Anderthalb, that fascinating but undeniably sour instrument that I’ve never been able to disassociate from its hostile, punch-and-judy origins. So I wanted to celebrate to its emotional opposite, one of the great instruments of the renaissance, the viola della cooperazione.
The viola della cooperazione, sometimes known as the ‘shared viol’ or simply the va-dc, was one of many multi-necked stringed instruments to emerge in the sixteenth century. The French luthier Alexandre Voboam (c.1634–1692) made double-necked guitars, the nineteenth century saw the Viennese ‘contraguitars’ of Stauffer and Scherzer, and modern acts from Aerosmith to ZZ Top have kept the tradition alive — to say nothing of Rick Nielsen of Cheap Trick, with his five-necked Hamer guitar. But while these instruments were designed for soloists, the va-dc was designed for two performers, who manipulated its multiple fretboards in tandem. This required considerable coordination, and a certain intimacy, explaining why some of history’s most famous va-dc virtuosos have been related, such as Giovanni Battista Vitali (1632–1692) and his son Tomaso Antonio (1663–1745), and Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber (1644–1704) and his niece Hayley.
Published February 3, 2023. Copyright © 2023 Jonathan Hoefler.
About
The objects in the Apocryphal Inventions series are technical chimeras, intentional misdirections coaxed from the generative AI platform Midjourney. Instead of iterating on the system’s early drafts to create ever more accurate renderings of real-world objects, creator Jonathan Hoefler subverted the system to refine and intensify its most intriguing misunderstandings, pushing the software to create beguiling, aestheticized nonsense. Some images have been retouched to make them more plausible; others have been left intact, appearing exactly as generated by the software. The accompanying descriptions, written by the author, offer fictitious backstories rooted in historical fact, which suggest how each of these inventions might have come to be.
These images represent some of AI’s most intriguing answers to confounding questions, an inversion of the more pressing debate in which it is humanity that must confront the difficult and existential questions posed by artificial intelligence.
Previously:
No. 53. The Anderthalb
Next:
No. 55. Dehomogenization Machines