William Tunnicliffe & Sons
‘Model P’ Printing Telegraph
1869

William Tunnicliffe & Sons, est. 1858, Birmingham, England. Stamped tinplate housing over cast iron chassis, oxidated enamel finish, galalith keys with glass keytops, gutta-percha feet. 6½ × 6⅝ × 9¼". Collection of the author.

"Tunnicliffe’s Model P Printing Telegraph" by Jonathan Hoefler, from the Apocryphal Inventions project.

Never seen before are these early misfires in the development of the typewriter. The ‘printing telegraphs’ shown as images 1 and 3 are by Wm. Tunnicliffe & Sons of Birmingham, the others by Schuchert & Lieberenz of Stuttgart.

Their varied input methods not only predate the emergence of qwerty-style layouts that would emerge as a standard in the 1870s, but failed to anticipate that the precipitous drop in price of sheet-fed paper would fortify its position as the enduring medium of correspondence: Tunnicliffe’s Model P of 1869 (fig. 1), and S&L’s Kleiner-Rotator of 1871 (fig. 2) imprint upon a continuous paper or cloth ribbon, while the Patent Great Northern (fig. 3) and the 552 ‘Liebchen’ (fig. 4) use a folding codex of linen. The bright colors, which mark these as domestic possessions rather than commercial equipment, were all achieved using a then-new technique for depositing cobalt oxide during the firing of the enamel, whose toxicity would lead to the almost total disappearance of these fascinating contraptions. My thanks to Valentýnka Nesmysl and Matthias Dumheter for opening the archives at the Nordrhein-Westfalen Industriemuseum for a visit.

Published December 3, 2022. Copyright © 2022 Jonathan Hoefler.

 

About

The objects in the Apocryphal Inventions series are technical chimeras, intentional misdirections coaxed from the generative AI platform Midjourney. Instead of iterating on the system’s early drafts to create ever more accurate renderings of real-world objects, creator Jonathan Hoefler subverted the system to refine and intensify its most intriguing misunderstandings, pushing the software to create beguiling, aestheticized nonsense. Some images have been retouched to make them more plausible; others have been left intact, appearing exactly as generated by the software. The accompanying descriptions, written by the author, offer fictitious backstories rooted in historical fact, which suggest how each of these inventions might have come to be.

These images represent some of AI’s most intriguing answers to confounding questions, an inversion of the more pressing debate in which it is humanity that must confront the difficult and existential questions posed by artificial intelligence.

Next:

No. 2. Automated Muselar