Leopoldus Rademacher (c. 1665–1721)
Omnisymphonium
c. 1703

Limed oak case with vernis martin finish, whalebone carvings, ivory and fruitwood keytops, internal mechanisms in copper and steel. 9½ × 9½ × 12⅛". Collection of the author.

"Omnisymphonium" by Jonathan Hoefler, from the Apocryphal Inventions project.

Another five eccentric musical instruments from the court of Joseph I, created by the workshop of Leopoldus Friedrich Rademacher (c. 1665–1721), if not the master himself.

Like the hurdy-gurdy, the organ, or the synthesizer, these are polyphonic multi-timbral instruments, designed to produce different kinds of sounds simultaneously, achieving the quality of many different kinds of instruments playing at once. In physical form, each in its own way is a meditation upon the relationship of the parts to the whole, from the riotous bazaar-like concert hall of the Omnisymphonium (fig. 1) to the stacked keyboards of the Tres-Sonos (fig. 4). These exhibit more interesting and impractical adjustments to the scale: only the fifth instrument depicts a standard twelve-tone scale, the others featuring various arrangements of keys and tunings inspired by Vicentino’s archicembalo of 1555. The scales in figures 1 and 2 omit the B♮, about which Rademacher had become superstitious after a encounter with a hornet; figures 3 and 4 use a ‘half-bastard’ scale of F♮, F♯, G♮, G♯, A♮, A†, A♯, A♯†, and B♮ (fig, 3, 4) for playing folk music in the Aortic and Ventral modes.

Published December 11, 2022. Copyright © 2022 Jonathan Hoefler.

 

About

The objects in the Apocryphal Inventions series are technical chimeras, intentional misdirections coaxed from the generative AI platform Midjourney. Instead of iterating on the system’s early drafts to create ever more accurate renderings of real-world objects, creator Jonathan Hoefler subverted the system to refine and intensify its most intriguing misunderstandings, pushing the software to create beguiling, aestheticized nonsense. Some images have been retouched to make them more plausible; others have been left intact, appearing exactly as generated by the software. The accompanying descriptions, written by the author, offer fictitious backstories rooted in historical fact, which suggest how each of these inventions might have come to be.

These images represent some of AI’s most intriguing answers to confounding questions, an inversion of the more pressing debate in which it is humanity that must confront the difficult and existential questions posed by artificial intelligence.

Previously:

No. 8. Mollusk-Made Typewriters

Next:

No. 10. Steganographic Encoders